STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT

April 17, 1942

April 17, 1942:   court document:

State of New York Supreme Court,
Appellate Division, Second Department.

In the Matter
of
"The Application of Albert Arthur Scattergoood
in a writ of habeas corpus to bring up the body of
Gene Arthur Scattergood, an infant.

APPEAL FROM ORDER

Albert Arthur Scattergood, Appellant,
Josephine Moore Orton and Edward H. Orton, Respondents.

Charles R. Weeks, Attorney for Patitioner-Appellant
Office & P.O. Address: 1517 Franklin Ave, Mineola, N.Y.

Evans & Rees, Attorneys for Respondents,
Office & P.O. Address, 220 Broadway, N.Y., N.Y.

Statement Under Rule 234

      This is an appeal from an oder dismissing a writ of habeas corpus brought to determine the custody of an infant. This proceeding was commenced on March 12th, 1942, by the service of the writ and the petition herein on the respondents Josephine Moore Orton and Edward H. Orton. The respondents' return was served on March 16th, 1942.
The issues were tried before Mr. Justice Henry G. Wenzel, Jr., sitting at Special Term, Part II of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, New York, on March 16th, 1942.

      The full names of the original parties are as above set forth. The name of the petitioner's attorney is Charles R. Weeks, . . . The names of the respondents' attorneys are Evans & Rees, . . .

      There has been no change of parties or attorneys herein.

      The order appealed from was granted on April 7th, 1942, and entered in the Nassau County Clerk's Office on April 8th, 1942. Notice of appeal to this Court was served on April 17th, 1942, and filed on April 20, 1942.

Notice of Appeal

Supreme Court - Nassau County.

In the Matter
of
The Aplication of ALBERT ARTHUR SCATTERGOOD
for a writ of habeas corpus to bring up the body of
GENE ARTHUR SCATTERGOOD, an infant.


Sirs:

      PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Albert Arthur Scattergood, the petitioner above-name, hereby appeals to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Department, from the final order made in the above entitled proceeding on the 7th day of April, 1942, and entered in the Office of the Clerk of Nassua County on the 8th day of April, 1942, dismissing the writ of habeas corpus herein and the proceedings has thereon, and that this appeal is taken from each and every part of said order, as well as from the whole thereof.

Dated, April 15th, 1942.

            Yours, etc.

            CHARLES R. WEEKS,
            Attorney for Petitioner

To:

     Charles E. Ransom,
     Clerk of the County of Nassau.

     Evans & Rees, Esqs.,
     Attorneys for Respondents






October 20, 1942:    the following "application of Albert Arthur Scattergood for a writ of habeas corpus to bring up the body of Gene Arthur Scattergood, as infant." was served on Evans & Rees.

From the   Memorandum of Petitoner-Appellant:

STATEMENT

      This is an appeal by the petitioner, Albert Arthur Scattergood, from an order dismmising a writ of habeas corpus brought to determine the custody of his infant son. This proceeding was commenced on March 12, 1942 by the service of the writ and petition herein on the respondent Josephine Moore Orton, the infant's maternal aunt, and her husband, the respondent Edward H. Orton.

      The issues were tried before Mr. Justice Henry G. Wenzel, Jr., sitting at Special Term, Part II of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, New York, on March 16th, 1942. The respondents' return was served on petitioner's attorney on March 16th, 1942, but not until after the evidence had been closed. The Court's memordandum decision was handed down on March 25th, 1942, holding that the petitioner was not entitled to the custory of his son as against the respondents herein on the ground that the "corporeal well being" of the child required that it remain with respondents. The order appealed from which gives custory of the child to responsents without leave to the father to make a further application or even giving him the right of visitation, was granted on April 7th, 1942, and entered in the Nassau County Clerk's Office on the following day.

THE FACTS.

(incomplete)

  • The petitioner, Albert Arthur Scattergood, and his wife, Mary Moore Scattergood, lived in Quincy, Massachusetts, a suburb of Boston. Both husband and wife were Christian Scientists and both worked at a nearby Christian Science rest home or retreat, the husband as a cook and the wife as a nurse (Record on Appeal, fols 120-122; 213-14). Mrs. Scattergood, the respondent Josephine Moore Orton, and respondents' counsel, H. Bradley Moore, Esq., were sisters and brother (fol. 105). Mrs Scattergood died in childbirth in the early morning of December 1st, 1940, her child, the infant herein, having been born a few hours before on November 30th, 1940 (fol 106). . .

  • Mrs Orton testified . . . that (Albert) Scattergood tried to make her promise that she "would bring Gene up as a Christian Scientist" (fol. 188), and that she replied: "I could never promise anything. I didn't know the circumstances that would come up, and that I had been reared in Christian Science - I went to the Christian Science Church, and I had the books, but I could never promise to teach Gene Christian Science, or make him go to any church. I wanted him to be broadmined enough to understand every church, and he said, 'I can't let you have him under those conditions.' And I said, 'Now is the time to decide those things,' and that was all that was said at the time."

 

 

Copyright Scattergood-Moore © 2007